Logo

Is it socially acceptable for individuals to wear clothing typically associated with the opposite gender? What are some reasons for or against this practice?

12.06.2025 06:29

Is it socially acceptable for individuals to wear clothing typically associated with the opposite gender? What are some reasons for or against this practice?

If you’re going to do it, do it 100% and do it well. You’ll enjoy it all the more and so will the people around you. It’s often good for a round of applause or a free drink.

c) Drag queens and Drag kings – an exaggerated satirical sub-section of the light entertainment field.

b) In light entertainment: female impersonators/comedians; pantomime dames in British theatre.

If you lived in South Africa, would you support nuclear power as a solution to the country's energy woes?

Reasons against it? Basically,

In Lancaster County, Pennsylvania or Salt Lake City it won’t be accepted. In Rio or Douarnenez at Mardi Gras it’s practically compulsory. (Seriously, I counted the men in skirts in a bar in Douarnenez: one in six.)

Socially acceptable? It depends on which bit of society you live in.

Summer Game Fest 2025 LIVE: Everything announced during the gaming showcase - Tom's Guide

3) Fetish crossdressers - who use clothes as a substitute for, or an essential precursor to, sex. This is commonest among teenage boys, but usually disappears or develops into transvestism later. It is rarely seen in public, although the word "fetish" is often misapplied by those who should know better.

Don’t do it in places where it’s illegal, like Russia.

6) Transvestites – what most people first think of. For transvestites, crossdressing is an end in itself; motives many and various. For most, these go back to childhood or before birth and are obsessive.

Why the end of Google as we know it could be your biggest opportunity yet - ZDNet

d) Stunt doubles.

5) Other professionals: the occasional spy/undercover policeman/criminal in disguise. Gay prostitutes.

There are many reasons. This can be broken down into the eight broad categories below, though most people only think of no.6:

What could be the result if I block a covert narc back after he said blocks were going back up, maybe we try this again?

2) Fashion crossdressers - some metrosexuals and most women fall into this category. Women in trousers – seen as a sexual and social aberration in 1900 – had become the norm by 2000.

1) Occasional crossdressers - Hallowe'en, practical jokers, fancy dress parties, students' rags... etc.

Ignore people who will quote their religion at you (unless it’s your religion too).

The Opener: Teel, Cubs, Tigers, Langeliers - MLB Trade Rumors

4) Entertainers.

If it’s merely your sexual fetish — see 3) above — don’t do it in public. You’ll look ridiculous and possible offend decency laws.

8) Those forced into crossdressing. This category is included for completeness but barely seems to exist in real life today. It was however observed in the period 1850-1950 when boys were occasionally forced into girls' clothes as a punishment at school or in the home. It is a staple of fiction – to escape from danger (Some Like It Hot), to obtain a job (Tootsie, Mrs Doubtfire), or forced by a sadistic female relative (much transvestite erotic fiction).

Why do some people refuse to explain their actions or behavior when asked? Why do they claim to not know the reason instead of providing an explanation?

a) In serious entertainment, actors playing a role. From Mark Rylance as Cleopatra or Judi Dench as Olivia to Antony Perkins in Psycho. Japanese Kabuki and Nō players. Sopranos singing "breeches" roles in opera.

7) Transsexuals – for many of them the cross-dressing is merely an incidental stage in their transition of identity. Once achieved, the wearing of the clothes of the other sex becomes the norm, and can no longer be called crossdressing.

Don’t do it unless you want to.

Finance leaders fear destructive U.S. debt scenario - Axios